Dota 2: Team Nemesis vs PlayTime - Game 1 Winner
This market refers to the Dota 2 Upper bracket semifinal 2 match between Team Nemesis and PlayTime in the The International South America Closed Qualifier Playoffs, initially scheduled for June 17 at 7:00PM ET. This market will resolve to "Team Nemesis" if Team Nemesis win Game 1 against PlayTime. This market will resolve to "PlayTime" if PlayTime win Game 1 against Team Nemesis. If the match begins but is not completed, and Game 1 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Game 1. If Game 1 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this m
This is a polymarket prediction market in the gaming category. Currently priced at 100% probability of YES. Total volume traded: $51K. 24-hour volume: $51K. Market closes June 18, 2026.
Dota 2: Team Nemesis vs PlayTime - Game 1 Winner
Resolution Rules
This market refers to the Dota 2 Upper bracket semifinal 2 match between Team Nemesis and PlayTime in the The International South America Closed Qualifier Playoffs, initially scheduled for June 17 at 7:00PM ET. This market will resolve to "Team Nemesis" if Team Nemesis win Game 1 against PlayTime. This market will resolve to "PlayTime" if PlayTime win Game 1 against Team Nemesis. If the match begins but is not completed, and Game 1 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Game 1. If Game 1 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://www.dotabuff.com. However, if https://www.dotabuff.com has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.