Valorant: EDward Gaming vs Leviatán Esports - Map 1 Winner
This market refers to the Valorant Lower bracket final match between EDward Gaming and Leviatán Esports in the VCT Masters London Playoffs, initially scheduled for June 20 at 9:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "EDward Gaming" if EDward Gaming win Map 1 against Leviatán Esports. This market will resolve to "Leviatán Esports" if Leviatán Esports win Map 1 against EDward Gaming. If the match begins but is not completed, and Map 1 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Map 1. If Map 1 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this mark
This is a polymarket prediction market in the gaming category. Currently priced at 100% probability of YES. Total volume traded: $185K. 24-hour volume: $185K. Market closes June 20, 2026.
Valorant: EDward Gaming vs Leviatán Esports - Map 1 Winner
Resolution Rules
This market refers to the Valorant Lower bracket final match between EDward Gaming and Leviatán Esports in the VCT Masters London Playoffs, initially scheduled for June 20 at 9:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "EDward Gaming" if EDward Gaming win Map 1 against Leviatán Esports. This market will resolve to "Leviatán Esports" if Leviatán Esports win Map 1 against EDward Gaming. If the match begins but is not completed, and Map 1 is concluded with a winner determined, this market will resolve based on the completed Map 1. If Map 1 is not completed for any reason, this market will resolve 50-50. If the match is canceled (not played at all) or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without play beginning, this market will resolve 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://vlr.gg. However, if https://vlr.gg has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.